Of the 8 planets in our solar system, only Venus has retrograde rotation.
@Jeffro: Wrong. Uranus has one too.
I'm curious as to what the typical atheist response is to the goldilocks universe (where everything is juuuust right) that we find ourself in?
For example, the current Astronomer Royal for the British Crown is Martin Rees. He has stated that if any of the 6 values listed below were different, our universe [and us] couldn't exist:
Rees’s six numbers are:
.
(1)The number of spatial dimensions we live in – 3
(2) The relative strength of the electrostatic to the gravitational force between two protons – This is a very large number approximately 10 to the 36th power.
(3) The fraction of mass converted to energy when hydrogen is fused to form helium – approximately 0.007.
(4) The average matter density of the Universe, rather than being expressed in kilogrammes per cubic metre, it is expressed in units where the critical density (10 to the 26th power of kilogrammes per cubic metre) is equal to one – approximately 0.32.
(5) The average dark energy density of the Universe, also expressed in units where the critical density is equal to one – 0.68.
(6) The final number is a measure of how tightly bound the large clusters and supercluster of galaxies are. On the scale used in Rees’s book it has the value 10 to the -5th power.
Are the fine tuning charactericts of the universe and the total eclipse of the sun, (and the monthly perfect total eclipse of the moon) that we see; are they examples of intentionality?
@SBF
materialists have got their head in the sand with regard to the evidence of fine tuning of the universe and its implications.
Agree. Materialism has not been a support for atheism for quite some time now.